Evaluating Digital Open Source Imagery: A Guide for Judges and Fact-finders

Author(s)
WITNESS; Open Society Justice Initiative; Swansea University; Queen Mary University of London; Mnemonic; Human Rights Center, University of California, Berkeley; Hertie School, and the Bonavero Institute of Human Rights, University of Oxford
Publication Date
May 24, 2024
Publication Type
Protocol
Topic(s)
Conflict, International Criminal Law, Investigations Program, Technology

Summary

The guide, based largely on the Berkeley Protocol on Digital Open Source Investigations, is intended to assist judges and other decision makers in their assessment of open source photographs and videos during investigations, and is available in English, French, Spanish, Arabic, and Ukrainian. It is organized around several key issues that a court or fact-finding body may need to address in their own evaluation of open source imagery evidence, including determining the authenticity of the digital image, and analyzing relevant metadata, source, location, and time information.

Key Takeaways

  • The guide, developed by multiple institutions and experts, serves as an instructional tool for judges and fact-finders to evaluate digital open source imagery, without providing methods for conducting investigations. It focuses on assessing the authenticity, reliability, and probative value of such evidence.
  • Digital open source information is increasingly used in courts and human rights bodies for evaluating evidence in international criminal and human rights cases. It includes publicly accessible data such as social media content, videos, and government-published data.
  • Key issues for evaluating digital open source information include analyzing content, metadata, source, location, and time information. Special attention is needed for verification, which involves techniques like geolocation and metadata analysis to authenticate and assess evidence.
  • Digital open source imagery presents unique challenges such as potential inauthenticity due to misattribution, staging, AI manipulations (deepfakes), and altered metadata. Despite these challenges, even manipulated content can have evidentiary value under careful scrutiny.
  • Various methods are employed to determine the location and time of digital imagery, such as geolocation techniques involving satellite imagery and terrain mapping, reverse searches, shadow analysis, and examination of metadata. These methods each have limitations and should ideally be used in conjunction to support evidence verification.

Suggested Citation

Center, W., California, U., School, B., Rights, A., & Oxford, U. (2024)
Evaluating Digital Open Source Imagery: A Guide for Judges and Fact-finders.
Human Rights Center, UC Berkeley. https://humanrights.berkeley.edu/publications/evaluating-digital-open-source-imagery-a-guide-for-judges-and-fact-finders/